Yes but here we are again.
If you take a look at my votes i.e.:
These are mostly “bigger” topics, but one, which is the hitpoint thing, and I use this quantization daily. There is no vote I can free up, as they are all equally important (to me). 4 of these have to do with the stability and efficiency of the program and only two of them are new features.
There are just no votes left for all the smaller inconsistencies and suggestions. @Louis_R created a WIKI for that purpose (thank you Louis), where you can see lots of handy FRs (and also Issues), which would really save lots of time when implemented. But there are just not enough votes to give them all their attention:
[WIKI] [Cubase 12.0.30] Issues and Feature Requests – user editable - Cubase - Steinberg Forums
Apart from that, there is another list I put together of smaller FRs and inconsistencies here:
Summary
Plugin scan path settings reset themselves after reopening Cubase - Cubase - Steinberg Forums
Talkback always disabled after Cubase restart - Cubase - Steinberg Forums
CTRL+SELECT not working for arranger events - Cubase - Steinberg Forums
Allow dragging files from Pool Trash into track - Cubase - Steinberg Forums
Export Settings saved with Project File - Cubase - Steinberg Forums
Set output of instrument channel - too complicated, not intuitive - Cubase - Steinberg Forums
Switching mono to stereo - Cubase - Steinberg Forums
Feaure Request-> Please consider to add routing to the track preset - Cubase - Steinberg Forums
Export tracks as they are (mono/stereo) - additional export audio mode - Cubase - Steinberg Forums
Let us cut the notes in variaudio where we want - Cubase - Steinberg Forums
So my question: Why not giving everyone unlimited votes (max. one vote per FR obviously)?
If someone thinks a certain FR is a good idea, why can’t he give it a vote, without having to delete one of his other votes somewhere else?